The ongoing antitrust trial against Meta is centered on the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. The government argues that these purchases eliminated potential competitors and solidified Meta's control over the social media market. A key aspect of the trial involves imagining alternative scenarios: what if Mark Zuckerberg had not acquired these companies?
One possibility is that other social media platforms could have emerged to fill the void. These new platforms might have offered different features or catered to niche audiences, leading to a more diverse and competitive market. Alternatively, Instagram and WhatsApp might have continued to grow independently, potentially evolving into major rivals to Facebook.
The trial raises fundamental questions about the role of acquisitions in the tech industry and their impact on innovation and consumer choice. The outcome could have significant implications for future mergers and acquisitions, shaping the competitive landscape for years to come. Economists and legal experts are closely watching the proceedings, as the case delves into the complexities of antitrust law and the challenges of predicting the future of technology.
What If Meta Never Bought Instagram and WhatsApp?

Meta is facing an antitrust trial, with the government arguing the company stifled competition by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp early on. The trial explores a hypothetical scenario: what would the tech landscape look like today if these deals hadn't happened? Experts are debating whether other companies would have risen to prominence, or if Instagram and WhatsApp would have thrived independently, potentially challenging Facebook's dominance.