The debate over 'forced reset triggers' has reignited following the continuation of a Trump administration policy. These triggers, which can be installed on AR-15 style rifles, allow for a much faster rate of fire, approaching that of a machine gun. While not technically classified as machine guns under federal law, gun control groups argue they pose a significant threat due to their increased lethality and potential for use in mass shootings.
Opponents of the triggers point to the difficulty in controlling a weapon firing at such a high rate, increasing the risk of accidental discharges and making it easier for individuals to inflict mass casualties. They urge Congress to take action to regulate or ban the sale of these devices.
Proponents, including some gun rights organizations, contend that 'forced reset triggers' are not machine guns because they require a separate pull of the trigger for each round fired. They argue that banning these devices would infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. The legal status of these triggers remains contested, with potential for future challenges in the courts.
Trump Era Rule Allowing 'Forced Reset Triggers' Stands, Sparks Debate
A Trump administration ruling that allows the sale of 'forced reset triggers' remains in effect. These devices enable semi-automatic rifles to fire at a rate similar to machine guns. Gun control advocates strongly oppose the decision, citing safety concerns and potential for misuse. Supporters argue the triggers are not true machine guns and are protected by the Second Amendment.
Source: Read the original article at NBC