Washington D.C. - The Supreme Court convened on Thursday to hear arguments concerning President Trump's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship, a policy enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The core of the debate centered on the extent to which federal judges can issue nationwide injunctions, preventing the executive branch from implementing policies across the country.
During the nearly three-hour session, justices questioned the legal basis for the executive order and its potential impact on the rights of children born in the United States to non-citizen parents. Attorneys representing the Trump administration argued that the order was necessary to address concerns about illegal immigration and national security. Opponents contended that it violates the Constitution and would create a system of second-class citizenship.
CBS News' chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford reported from Washington D.C., noting the intense scrutiny the court applied to both sides of the argument. Crawford highlighted the justices' concern over the potential for judicial overreach and the need to balance the powers of the three branches of government. The Supreme Court is expected to render its decision in the coming months, a ruling that will likely reshape the landscape of immigration law and executive power in the United States.
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
The Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday regarding President Trump's executive order aiming to end birthright citizenship. The justices spent nearly three hours debating the scope of judicial power and the use of nationwide injunctions. Legal experts say the case could have major implications for future executive actions. The court is expected to issue a ruling in the coming months.
Source: Read the original article at CBS