Two federal judges, one in New York and another in Colorado, have issued rulings blocking the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act. The rulings effectively prevent the administration from using the law to detain or deport immigrants in the ways they had proposed. The judges cited concerns about due process and the potential for the law to be applied in a manner inconsistent with constitutional protections.
The Alien Enemies Act, a law dating back to 1798, grants the president broad powers to detain or deport citizens of enemy nations during times of war or declared invasion. The Trump administration had argued that the current situation at the border constituted an 'invasion,' justifying the use of the Act. However, the judges rejected this argument, stating that the administration's interpretation stretched the definition of 'invasion' beyond its legal meaning.
These rulings represent a significant setback for the administration's immigration policies and add to the growing number of legal challenges it faces. Opponents of the administration's immigration policies have argued that they are often based on discriminatory motives and violate fundamental rights. The Department of Justice has not yet commented on whether it plans to appeal the rulings.
Judges Block Trump Administration's Use of Alien Enemies Act
Federal judges in New York and Colorado have ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to use the Alien Enemies Act. The rulings prevent the government from applying the law in ways the judges deemed unconstitutional. This marks the second time this week that courts have challenged the administration's immigration policies. The Alien Enemies Act, originally intended for wartime, has been a point of contention in recent immigration debates.
Source: Read the original article at CBS