Immigration Deportation Scorecard Used Tattoos, Social Media, Records Show

A controversial point system used by immigration authorities to prioritize deportations relied on factors such as tattoos and social media activity, according to court filings obtained by the ACLU. The records detail how immigration officials assigned points based on various criteria, including criminal history, immigration status, and information gleaned from social media posts and even visible tattoos.

Families and attorneys representing those targeted for deportation, particularly Venezuelan nationals, argue that the system is inherently biased and leads to unfair targeting. They claim the scorecard disproportionately impacts individuals based on subjective interpretations of their online presence and physical appearance.

The ACLU is challenging the use of the scorecard in court, arguing that it violates due process rights and raises serious concerns about discrimination. The organization contends that relying on such criteria can lead to the wrongful deportation of individuals who pose no threat to public safety. Immigration authorities have not yet commented on the specific allegations but maintain that deportation decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, following established legal procedures.

The case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding immigration enforcement practices and the balance between national security concerns and individual rights. Critics of the scorecard argue that it represents a dangerous shift towards a more arbitrary and discriminatory system of immigration control.