Boise, ID - A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against Idaho's new immigration law, House Bill 486, effectively blocking its enforcement. The law, passed by the Idaho legislature earlier this year, would have allowed state law enforcement officers to arrest individuals suspected of being in the country illegally. The ACLU quickly filed a lawsuit, claiming the law was unconstitutional and interfered with the federal government's power to regulate immigration.
The judge's decision is a victory for the ACLU and other immigration advocacy groups, who argued that the law would lead to racial profiling and discrimination. The injunction will remain in place while the legal challenge proceeds through the courts. Idaho officials have expressed disappointment with the ruling and are considering their options, including a possible appeal. The state maintains that the law was intended to address concerns about public safety and the impact of illegal immigration on the state's resources.
Opponents of the law argue that it mirrors similar legislation passed in other states, such as Arizona's SB 1070, which faced legal challenges and was eventually scaled back by the Supreme Court. They contend that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and that states should not be able to create their own immigration laws. The legal battle over Idaho's immigration law is expected to continue for several months, and its outcome could have significant implications for immigration policy in other states.
Idaho Immigration Law Blocked by Federal Judge
A federal judge has temporarily stopped a new Idaho law that aimed to crack down on illegal immigration. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the state, arguing the law overstepped federal authority on immigration matters. The judge agreed, issuing a preliminary injunction that prevents the law from taking effect while the case is heard. This ruling marks a significant victory for immigration advocates.