Hotel Security Guard Claims Diddy Paid $100K for Cassie Assault Video
A former hotel security officer is alleging that Sean 'Diddy' Combs paid him $100,000 for surveillance footage depicting an assault on Casandra Ventura, also known as Cassie. The New York Times reported that the payment was allegedly made in exchange for video showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura. This claim adds another layer to the ongoing legal battles and public scrutiny surrounding the music mogul. The video's content and the circumstances surrounding its acquisition are now central to the unfolding narrative.
A former hotel security officer has come forward with allegations that Sean 'Diddy' Combs paid him $100,000 in cash for surveillance video showing an assault on Casandra Ventura, known professionally as Cassie. According to a report in The New York Times, the officer claims Combs paid him using a brown bag filled with the money.
The video in question allegedly depicts Combs physically assaulting Ventura. The details of the alleged assault and the subsequent payment are now under intense scrutiny as part of the ongoing legal proceedings and public discourse surrounding the music mogul.
Neither Combs nor his representatives have yet issued a statement directly addressing this specific allegation. However, previous statements have denied similar claims. The emergence of this new account from the hotel security officer is expected to further fuel the controversy and potentially impact the legal landscape of the case.
The video in question allegedly depicts Combs physically assaulting Ventura. The details of the alleged assault and the subsequent payment are now under intense scrutiny as part of the ongoing legal proceedings and public discourse surrounding the music mogul.
Neither Combs nor his representatives have yet issued a statement directly addressing this specific allegation. However, previous statements have denied similar claims. The emergence of this new account from the hotel security officer is expected to further fuel the controversy and potentially impact the legal landscape of the case.