Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett has penned an opinion piece criticizing what he describes as the rise of 'rogue, leftist judges' who prioritize feelings over facts. Jarrett argues that this trend undermines the fundamental principle of equal justice under the law. He claims that these judges are driven by an obsession with emotional considerations and political agendas, rather than impartial legal analysis.
Jarrett contends that the same liberals who once championed the idea of equality under the law are now advocating for activist judges to be immune from prosecution. He asserts that these judges often rely on personal feelings and political biases when making decisions, rather than adhering to established legal precedents and factual evidence.
He further argues that this prioritization of feelings over facts erodes public trust in the judiciary and creates a system where justice is not blind. Jarrett calls for greater accountability for judges who he believes are abusing their power and undermining the rule of law. He urges a return to a system where judicial decisions are based on objective facts and legal principles, rather than subjective emotions and political considerations.
Gregg Jarrett: Leftist Judges Prioritize Feelings Over Facts
Gregg Jarrett argues that some judges are prioritizing personal feelings and political agendas over objective facts and the rule of law. He claims this trend, particularly among some leftist judges, undermines the principle of equal justice for all. Jarrett suggests this stems from an obsession with emotional considerations rather than impartial legal analysis. He criticizes what he sees as a growing movement to shield these 'activist' judges from accountability.