Washington D.C. - Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene is raising objections to a provision within the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that places restrictions on states' authority to regulate artificial intelligence (AI). According to Greene, the provision would preempt state-level AI regulations for a period of ten years.
Greene expressed her disapproval, stating, "I would have voted NO if I had known." Her concern stems from the belief that states should retain the ability to address the unique challenges and opportunities presented by AI within their jurisdictions. She argues that a federal mandate limiting state control could stifle innovation and prevent states from adequately protecting their citizens from potential risks associated with the rapidly evolving technology.
The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is a comprehensive piece of legislation covering various aspects of technology and innovation. The AI provision has sparked debate among lawmakers, with some arguing that a unified national approach to AI regulation is necessary to foster innovation and prevent a fragmented regulatory landscape. Others, like Greene, maintain that states are better positioned to understand and respond to the specific needs of their communities in the context of AI development and deployment. The bill's future remains uncertain as lawmakers grapple with the implications of this controversial provision.
Greene Criticizes AI Provision in 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has voiced concerns regarding a section within the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that limits states' ability to regulate artificial intelligence. The provision would prevent states from creating their own AI regulations for ten years. Greene stated she would have opposed the bill had she been aware of this specific clause. She believes this federal overreach could hinder states from addressing potential risks associated with AI.