Washington D.C. - Closing arguments have wrapped up in the significant antitrust case between Google and the U.S. Department of Justice. The case, which began nine months ago, alleges that Google has illegally maintained a monopoly over the search engine market, stifling competition and harming consumers. The Justice Department argued that Google used anti-competitive practices to dominate search, while Google maintained that its success is due to its superior product and innovation.
During the trial, both sides presented extensive evidence, including internal documents, expert testimony, and market data. The Justice Department focused on Google's agreements with phone manufacturers and mobile carriers, arguing that these deals effectively locked out rival search engines. Google countered that these partnerships were beneficial to consumers and that other search engines could compete if they offered a better product.
The judge presiding over the case will now review all the evidence presented during the trial. A ruling is expected in the coming months. The outcome of the case could have major implications for the future of the search engine market and the broader tech industry, potentially leading to changes in how Google operates and how other tech companies are regulated. The tech sector and legal experts are closely watching the case, as it could set precedents for future antitrust enforcement in the digital age.
Google Antitrust Case: Closing Arguments Conclude
The landmark antitrust case between Google and the Justice Department has reached its final stage. After months of testimony and evidence, closing arguments have concluded. The case centers around allegations that Google holds a monopoly over the search engine market, impacting competition and innovation. A federal judge will now review the evidence before issuing a ruling.
Source: Read the original article at CBS