A second federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's policy restricting transgender people from serving in the military. The judge issued a scathing ruling, stating that the policy amounts to a "de facto blanket prohibition" on transgender service. This means that, in the judge's opinion, the policy effectively bans transgender individuals from serving, even if it doesn't explicitly say so.
The ruling is a significant setback for the Trump administration, which has been trying to implement this policy for several years. Opponents of the ban argue that it is discriminatory and based on prejudice, not on military readiness. They point to the fact that transgender individuals have been serving openly in the military since 2016, and there have been no documented problems.
The Justice Department has argued that the policy is necessary to ensure military effectiveness and cohesion. They claim that the policy is based on medical concerns and that it is not discriminatory. However, the judge rejected these arguments, saying that they were not supported by evidence.
This ruling is likely to be appealed, and the legal battle over transgender military service is far from over. The issue could ultimately end up before the Supreme Court.
Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Transgender Military Ban Again
A federal judge has once again blocked the Trump administration's policy regarding transgender individuals serving in the military. The judge called the policy a "de facto blanket prohibition" against transgender service members. This ruling marks the second time a judge has halted the ban, raising questions about its legality and fairness. The decision underscores the ongoing legal battles surrounding transgender rights and military service.
Source: Read the original article at ABC