Ex-Sheriff Accused of Killing Judge Claims Grand Jury Flaw

Attorneys representing Mickey Stines, the former sheriff charged with the murder of District Judge Kevin Mullins, have filed a motion arguing that the state of Kentucky improperly conducted the grand jury proceedings that led to his indictment. According to a report, Stines' legal team contends that the state failed to adhere to established legal protocols during the grand jury selection and presentation of evidence.

The defense claims that these procedural errors could invalidate the entire indictment, effectively throwing out the murder case against Stines. The specific details of the alleged errors have not been publicly released, but the motion suggests they involve significant deviations from standard grand jury practices.

Judge Mullins was found dead in his chambers earlier this year, and Stines was quickly identified as the prime suspect. The case has drawn considerable attention due to the high-profile nature of both the victim and the accused. The upcoming hearing on the defense's motion is expected to be closely watched, as its outcome could have a significant impact on the future of the case. The Kentucky Attorney General's office has not yet responded to requests for comment on the defense's claims.