DOJ Reverses Policy Protecting Journalists' Records in Leak Investigations

Washington D.C. - The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reversed a policy that limited the ability of federal prosecutors to obtain journalists' communications records in leak investigations. The policy change, announced in an internal memo by Attorney General Pam Bondi and obtained by CBS News, effectively reinstates the possibility of subpoenas or search warrants targeting reporters' phones, computers, and email accounts.

The previous policy, implemented under the Biden administration, aimed to protect journalists' ability to report on government activities without fear of reprisal or source compromise. It largely prohibited the DOJ from seeking journalists' records unless there was a credible threat of imminent harm or other exceptional circumstances.

Bondi's memo argues that the previous policy unduly restricted the DOJ's ability to investigate and prosecute unauthorized disclosures of classified information, which she described as a serious threat to national security. The memo states that the DOJ must have the tools necessary to identify and hold accountable those who leak classified information, even if it means potentially accessing journalists' records.

The reversal has drawn immediate criticism from media organizations and press freedom advocates. They argue that the policy will have a chilling effect on investigative journalism and make it more difficult for reporters to uncover government misconduct. Concerns have also been raised about the potential for abuse, with some fearing that the DOJ could use the policy to target journalists who are critical of the administration.

The DOJ maintains that it will exercise caution and restraint when considering the seizure of journalists' records, and that any such action will be subject to strict internal review and approval. However, critics remain skeptical, arguing that the policy creates an inherent conflict between the government's interest in protecting classified information and the public's right to a free and independent press. The debate over the balance between national security and press freedom is expected to continue.