The Justice Department is currently reviewing pardons issued during Joe Biden's presidency, focusing on instances where an autopen was used for signing. An autopen is a machine that replicates a person's signature. Critics question the legality and appropriateness of using such a device for official pardons, arguing that it diminishes the significance of the act and potentially violates legal requirements for presidential signatures.
The review comes amid ongoing debate regarding the individuals who received pardons during Biden's time in office. Some pardons were met with public criticism due to the nature of the crimes committed or the individuals' past actions. The use of an autopen only intensifies the controversy, prompting calls for greater transparency and accountability in the pardon process. Legal experts are divided on whether autopen signatures are legally binding for pardons, adding further uncertainty to the situation. The outcome of the Justice Department's review could have significant implications for the validity of these pardons and the future use of autopens in presidential actions.
Biden Pardons Under Scrutiny: Autopen Use Raises Questions
Former President Joe Biden's use of an autopen to sign pardons is facing renewed scrutiny. The Justice Department is reportedly reviewing the list of individuals granted clemency during his term. Concerns have been raised about the validity and legality of pardons signed with a machine rather than by hand. This development adds another layer of complexity to the already controversial topic of presidential pardons.