A federal appeals court has determined that art created entirely by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law. The ruling emphasizes that copyright protection requires at least an element of human authorship. The case centered on a dispute regarding the copyrightability of an image generated by an AI system without direct human input.
The court's decision aligns with previous rulings and interpretations of copyright law, which traditionally requires a human creator for a work to be eligible for copyright. This ruling has significant implications for the burgeoning field of AI-generated art and content, potentially impacting how artists and developers approach the creation and ownership of such works.
Experts believe this decision will spur further debate and legal challenges as AI technology continues to evolve and generate increasingly sophisticated and original content. The long-term effects on the art market and intellectual property rights remain to be seen, but the ruling provides a clear legal precedent for the time being.
AI-Generated Art Can't Be Copyrighted, Court Rules
A federal appeals court has ruled that artwork created solely by artificial intelligence is not eligible for copyright protection in the United States. The court stated that U.S. copyright law requires at least some initial human authorship for a work to be copyrighted. This decision clarifies the legal status of AI-generated content and its implications for artists and technology developers. The ruling underscores the importance of human involvement in the creative process to secure copyright.
Source: Read the original article at NBC